Subject	Re: SMZ's do it and the SMZ was designed for ultimate handli
Posted by	Snuffy on December 06, 2002 at 7:12 AM
	This message has been viewed 138 times.
In Reply To	SMZ's do it and the SMZ was designed for ultimate handling-> posted by 300zx.ca on December 06, 2002 at 04:49 AM
Message	: Its true to decrease understeer one thing to be done is to increase one tire size on the rear, effectivily raising the rear end more allowing more dominating weight transfer to the front which inturn can help traction in. If you buy correct size rubber for 18" rim, the diameter of whole wheel is not bigger than stock. So the car doesnt sit higher. I'd say that lower profile tire that's needed in the rear with bigger rim makes the rear stiffer and thus produces more oversteer. I would agree about looks though. When looking at a Z, the rear tire always "looks" smaller than front tire, if they are same size. So i guess that 17" - 18" setup would look more balanced than 17" or 18" all around. 1990 2+2 Twin Turbo - Sasha - ICQ 2596349
Follow Ups	17 front 18 rear wheel setup good or bad? - GShort24 01:44:13 12/06/02 I dont know of any benifit from differnt sizes - Cooltrickz32 02:31:12 12/06/02 SMZ's do it and the SMZ was designed for ultimate handling-> - 300zx.ca 04:49:21 12/06/02 Re: SMZ's do it and the SMZ was designed for ultimate handli - Snuffy 07:12:57 12/06/02 I have the AVS 17/18 combo, from what I know cars w. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 08:04:09 12/06/02 I myself have thought of doing this...I like my 17"s - Rob.M 09:17:06 12/06/02 I have that type of setup - Playboy 10:24:25 12/06/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.